The British company, named after the company’s founder and creative director, filed suit with the Chinese authorities in 2000.

Part of the problem, however, was that the Chinese system favours a first-come, first-served principle in the registering of trademarks.

Manolo Blahnik was founded in 1970 and the brands shoes have been featured in numerous TV shows and films. Photo: Reuters

The case has only now been resolved by the Supreme People’s Court of China.

Meet Elon Musk’s 3 baby mamas – but what do they all have in common?

“We are truly humbled and grateful for the support we have received in China and internationally, both from within the fashion industry and beyond,” said Spanish designer Blahnik in a company statement.

Famous shoe designer Mr Manolo Blahnik has waited 20 years to enter the China market. Photo: SCMP Archive
Blahnik’s creations are known the world over, especially after they were one of the luxury accessories featured in the hit television series Sex and the City.

The legal battle meant they were kept out of the potentially lucrative Chinese market for more than two decades.

“We look forward with excitement to joining its dynamic future by sharing Manolo’s story, creations and passions,” said Blahnik’s niece, company chief executive Kristina Blahnik.

Kristina Blahnik and Manolo Blahnik. Photo: @kristinablahnik/Instagram

“Manolo Blahnik will continue to vigorously protect its trademarks worldwide in the interests of my uncle Manolo, our customers and our business,” she added.

Several Western groups have experienced similar problems in China, discovering that when they tried to sell to that market a local firm had already set up a similar sounding company.

Meet Elvis Presley’s 4 grandchildren … and find out what they’re doing now

A Beijing court initially dismissed a trademark case brought by US basketball superstar Michael Jordan against Qiaodan Sports Co, which uses a similar name and logo to his Nike-produced brand. Photo: AFP

In 2016, basketball megastar Michael Jordan won part of his trademark suit against a China-based sportswear company, following a years-long struggle for control over the rights to his Chinese name.

The rival company had used a Chinese rendering of the athlete’s name widely known by the country’s consumers to break into the market.